Gonzaga, Grams. C., Haselton, Yards. G., Smurda, J., Davies, Meters. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Progression and you can People Behavior, 29(2), 119–126.
Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. Yards. (2000). The place from accessory when you look at the peoples mating. Review of Standard Mindset, 4(2), 186–204.
Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A great. (2002). Internet paradox reviewed. Log away from Social Factors, 58(1), 49–74.
Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Websites paradox: A personal technical one decrease personal involvement and you will psychological well-being? Western Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.
Kreider, Roentgen.Yards., & Sphere, J. Meters. (2001). Amount, time, and you Litauen-brude will time of marriages and you will divorces. Current Inhabitants Records, 70-80, (Arizona, DC: U.S. Census Bureau, 2005).
Lemieux, R., & Hale, J. L. (2002). Cross-sectional research away from closeness, hobbies, and you may partnership: Assessment the assumptions of your triangular theory off like. Emotional Profile, 90(step 3,Pt1), 1009-1014. doi:/PR0.ninety.step 3.1009-1014
Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, Age. (2004). Feeling best from the starting even worse: Personal reviews contained in this romantic relationships. Diary out of Character and you can Societal Mindset, 87(1), 80–95.
Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. An effective., & Gailliot, M. T. (2009). Intrasexual vigilance: The implicit cognition of romantic rivalry. Record of Identification and you can Social Mindset, 97(1), 74–87.
A beneficial. (2001)mitment and you may relationships restoration systems
Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. A good., & Gonzaga, Grams. C. (2008). Automated inattention to help you attractive alternatives: The new developed mindset from relationships repair. Development and you may Person Conclusion, 29(5), 343–349.
pold, B. E. (1981). Sequential analysis out-of disagreement and you can accord in disappointed and you will nondistressed relationship lovers. Diary of Asking and you can Health-related Mindset, 49(4), 554–567.
McKenna, K. Y. An excellent., Eco-friendly, An excellent. S., Gleason, Yards. J. (2002). Relationship creation on the web: What is the larger appeal? Journal from Societal Issues, 58(1), 9–29.
The many benefits of self-confident illusions: Idealization additionally the build off pleasure inside the romantic relationship
Neff, L. A great., & Karney, B. R. (2002). Self-research objectives for the intimate relationships: A model of all over the world enhancement and certain verification. Into the P. Noller & J. An effective. Feeney (Eds.), Insights ents regarding the examination of pair telecommunications (pp. 32–58). Ny, NY: Cambridge College or university Drive.
Obegi, J. H. (2008). The development of the client-counselor bond from the contact lens away from accessory theory. Psychotherapy: Theory, Browse, Routine, Training, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330
Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). The latest public keeping track of program: Enhanced sensitivity to help you personal cues due to the fact a transformative response to personal exception. Within the K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The fresh personal outcast: Ostracism, personal difference, getting rejected, and you can intimidation (pp. 213–226). Ny, NY: Therapy Force.
Enter, T., & Lydon, J. Age. (2001). Around the world and certain relational habits on the connection with societal relations. Record off Identification and you can Social Therapy, 80(4), 613–631.
Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. A good., Tran, S., ). Attachment and pointers trying to inside the intimate dating. Identification and you can Societal Psychology Bulletin, 33(3), 422–438.
Ross, L. Roentgen., & Spinner, B. (2001). General and specific accessory representations inside adulthood: Can there be a love?. Journal Out of Societal And private Relationships, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001
Rusbult, C. Age., Olsen, N., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. In J. Harvey & An excellent. Wenzel (Eds.), Personal close relationships: Restoration and you can improvement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schul, Y., & Vinokur, A. D. (2000). Projection really perception one of spouses as a function of the latest similarity inside their shared experiences. Identification And you may Public Therapy Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008
Seligman, C., Fazio, R. H., & Zanna, Yards. P. (1980). Aftereffects of salience off extrinsic perks to the taste and you will loving. Record of Character and you may Public Mindset, 38(3), 453–460.